Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate

dc.careerEscuela de Ciencias Biológicases
dc.category.authorprincipalen_US
dc.contributor.authorFélix Grijalva, Fernando
dc.contributor.correspondingFélix Grijalva, Fernando
dc.countryEcuadores
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-04T21:30:27Z
dc.date.available2023-11-04T21:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.dedication.authorTCes
dc.description.abstractWe weighted krill density values as data are overdispersed (i.e., its variance ishigher than its mean), so that using the mean in the analysis would probably lead to a misinterpretation of thecorrelation between variables being tested. Cross-correlation methods allow the identification of the time lag thatmaximizes the correlation between the explanatory and the response variables (Legendre & Legendre, 1998) andwas run in PAST software version 3.0 (Hammer et al., 2001). The result was later used in a regression model run inR software version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020) to test the relationship between krill biomass and RBR weighted byeffort (number of trips of each year). We considered a 0.05 level of significance in the analysis.Relative birth rates of humpback whales were computed from data collected during 278 whale-watching trips(M = 39.7 ± 7.9 per year) (Table 1). A total of 127 calves (M = 18.1 ± 13.2 per year) and 1,637 noncalves (M = 233.8± 130.4 per year) were recorded, excluding resights. The RBR (M = 0.07 ± 0.03) was significantly correlated with krilldensity in the previous year (i.e., lagged by 1 year; r2= 0.9, p = .02; Figure 2). The relationship between RBR and krilldensity in the previous year balanced by the number of trips was also positive and significant (r2= 0.8, p = .02).This is the first time that the relationship between environmental conditions around the Antarctic Peninsula andcalf production by humpback whales from Breeding Stock G has been investigated.en_US
dc.facultyCiencias Exactas y Naturaleses
dc.id.author1703874204
dc.id.type1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805
dc.identifier.issn0824-0469
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805
dc.indexed.databaseScimago Journal Rankes
dc.language.isoen
dc.list.authorsSeyboth, E., Félix, F., Lea, M., Dalla, L., Watters, G., Reid, K., & Secchi, E.
dc.magazine.pageRange1498-1506
dc.magazine.titleMarine Mammal Scienceen_US
dc.magazine.volumeChapter37(4)
dc.rightsOpenAccessen
dc.statepublisheden_US
dc.subjectEcología marinaes
dc.subjectReproducción animales
dc.subjectMamíferos acuáticoses
dc.subjectBallenaes
dc.subjectEcología marina
dc.subjectReproducción animal
dc.subjectMamíferos acuáticos
dc.subjectBallena
dc.titleInfluence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rateen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: