Il pensiero filosofico di Ennio De Giorgi
| dc.career | Escuela de Comunicación | es |
| dc.category.author | principal | es |
| dc.contributor.author | Di Patre, Patrizia | |
| dc.contributor.corresponding | Di Patre, Patrizia | es |
| dc.country | Ecuador | es |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-04T21:30:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-04T21:30:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-08 | |
| dc.dedication.author | TC | es |
| dc.description.abstract | Russell and De Giorgi’s approaches, starting from the logical limitations established by Gödel, appear to be unusually divergent. De Giorgi’s ultra-experimental technique will end up opposing to Russell’s theory of types – paradoxically close to certain Thomistic solutions – a formulation free from scholasticism; similarly, the ambitions of Pythagorean completeness present in Russell are replaced, in De Giorgi’s philosophy, with an adherence to insolubility as a guarantee of transcendence. «God cannot be reduced to the “first self-understanding entityµ». With this judgment of strict scientific observance, and only apparent religious apostasy, De Giorgi is girding to rethink the conditions of mathematical formalism from within. | es |
| dc.faculty | Comunicación, Lingüística y Literatura | es |
| dc.id.author | 1712706520 | es |
| dc.id.type | 1 | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1404/101354 | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0393-2451 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1404/101354 | es |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4426 | |
| dc.indexed.database | Other | es |
| dc.list.authors | Di Patre, P. | es |
| dc.magazine.pageRange | 213-227 | es |
| dc.magazine.title | Intersezioni | es |
| dc.magazine.volumeChapter | 41(2) | es |
| dc.rights | OpenAccess | es |
| dc.state | published | es |
| dc.subject | Filosofía | es |
| dc.subject | Lógica matemática | es |
| dc.title | Il pensiero filosofico di Ennio De Giorgi | es |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1