Eficacia jurídica de la conciliación como método alternativo de solución de conflictos en los delitos de robo en la ciudad de Ibarra durante el año 2018
Loading...
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
El Estado ecuatoriano cuenta con un marco jurídico pro métodos alternativos de resolución
de conflictos a partir de la entrada en vigencia de la Ley de Arbitraje y Mediación, en el
año 1997; posteriormente, su reconocimiento se realiza en la Constitución Política del año
1998 y ratificados en la actual Constitución de la República del Ecuador del año 2008, del
mismo modo el Código Orgánico Integral Penal (COIP) lo establece en los Arts. 662 y ss.,
en los cuales la conciliación podrá presentarse hasta antes de la conclusión de la etapa de
instrucción fiscal en los casos señalados. Esta indagación científica tiene como objetivo
general determinar si la conciliación como método alternativo de solución de conflictos fue
recurrente en el procesamiento de delitos de robo en la Ciudad de Ibarra, Provincia de
Imbabura en el periodo 2018, se acude al enfoque mixto cualitativo y cuantitativo
analizando aquellos aspectos particulares contenidos dentro de los procesos de delitos de
robo sometidos a conciliación, que contribuyeron tanto al aumento como a la disminución
del grado de eficacia de este mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos, con un nivel
de profundidad descriptivo debido a que se procede a detallar el estado de la investigación,
lo que lleva a la aplicación del método socio jurídico y deductivo como plan a seguir,
tomando en cuenta la entrevista de expertos para precisar que la conciliación en materia
penal, con la implementación del COIP, al involucrar la conciliación como una alternativa
procesal responde a la concepción de justicia restaurativa entendida como un justo
equilibrio de pretensiones entre victimario y víctima. Esta institución permite imponer una
sanción justa al primero y una debida reparación al segundo, bajo parámetros
constitucionales, es decir, devuelve el conflicto a las partes.
The Ecuadorian State has a legal framework for alternative methods of conflict resolution after the entry into force of the Arbitration and Mediation Law in 1997; subsequently, its recognition is made in the Political Constitution of 1998 and ratified in the current Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador of 2008, in the same way the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code (COIP) establishes it in Arts. 662 et seq., In which the conciliation may be submitted until before the conclusion of the fiscal investigation stage in the cases indicated. The general objective of this scientific inquiry is to determine whether conciliation as an alternative method of conflict resolution was recurrent in the prosecution of theft crimes in the City of Ibarra, Province of Imbabura in the period 2018, using the mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, analyzing those particular aspects contained within the robbery crimes processes subject to conciliation, which contributed to both the increase and the decrease in the degree of effectiveness of this alternative dispute resolution mechanism, with a descriptive depth level due to the fact that it proceeds to detail the status of the investigation, which leads to the application of the socio-legal and deductive method as a plan to follow, taking into account the and the interview of experts to specify that the conciliation in criminal matters, with the implementation of the COIP, By involving conciliation as a procedural alternative, it responds to the conception of restorative justice understood as a fair balance of claims between perpetrator and victim. This institution allows the imposition of a just sanction to the first and a due reparation to the second, under constitutional parameters, that is, it returns the conflict to the parties.
The Ecuadorian State has a legal framework for alternative methods of conflict resolution after the entry into force of the Arbitration and Mediation Law in 1997; subsequently, its recognition is made in the Political Constitution of 1998 and ratified in the current Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador of 2008, in the same way the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code (COIP) establishes it in Arts. 662 et seq., In which the conciliation may be submitted until before the conclusion of the fiscal investigation stage in the cases indicated. The general objective of this scientific inquiry is to determine whether conciliation as an alternative method of conflict resolution was recurrent in the prosecution of theft crimes in the City of Ibarra, Province of Imbabura in the period 2018, using the mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, analyzing those particular aspects contained within the robbery crimes processes subject to conciliation, which contributed to both the increase and the decrease in the degree of effectiveness of this alternative dispute resolution mechanism, with a descriptive depth level due to the fact that it proceeds to detail the status of the investigation, which leads to the application of the socio-legal and deductive method as a plan to follow, taking into account the and the interview of experts to specify that the conciliation in criminal matters, with the implementation of the COIP, By involving conciliation as a procedural alternative, it responds to the conception of restorative justice understood as a fair balance of claims between perpetrator and victim. This institution allows the imposition of a just sanction to the first and a due reparation to the second, under constitutional parameters, that is, it returns the conflict to the parties.
Description
Keywords
Conciliación, Robo, Mecanismo, Heterocompositivo