Los factores de riesgo psicosocial y su incidencia en el estrés, contexto de pandemia Covid 19 en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas
Loading...
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La presente investigación se ejecutó con personal docente, administrativos y trabajadores de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas (PUCESE), El objetivo fue examinar los factores riesgo psicosocial y su incidencia en el estrés. La metodología utilizada es cualitativa-cuantitativa, no experimental, correlacional y corte transversal. En la metodología se usó el método CoPsoQ-istas21(V2), en la primera variable y el inventario Burnout de Maslach (MBI) para estrés laboral, los instrumentos cuentan con confiabilidad, validez y pertinencia. Los resultados validan la hipótesis central el riesgo psicosocial incide en el ritmo de trabajo (93,5%) los niveles de estrés (altos) por sexo, hombres X 2= 122,8 y Coeficiente de Cramer V=212,8 asociación aceptable y mujeres X 2= 11,9 y con V=66,01 asociación aceptable. Riesgos psicosociales más favorables para ambos sexos: posibilidades de desarrollo 85,4%, sentido del trabajo 82,1%, confianza vertical 90,2%, reconocimiento 87%, justicia 73,2%, exigencias de esconder emociones 52,8%. Los factores más desfavorables: exigencias emocionales 51,2%, apoyo social de compañeros 58,5%, inseguridad sobre el empleo 59,3%, inseguridad sobre las condiciones de trabajo 60,2%, conflicto de rol 61% y el ritmo de trabajo 93,5%. Niveles de estrés alto sexo femenino: Cansancio emocional (CE) 17%, Despersonalización (DP) 10% y Realización personal (RP) el 31%. Medio CE 30%, DP 34% y RP 32%. Nivel bajo CE 27%, DP 30% y RP 11%. Para el sexo masculino altos: DP 50%. Medio CE 9% y nivel bajo CE 41% y RP 50%. Las conclusiones indican una mayor incidencia de riesgo psicosociales y estrés para el sexo femenino versus el sexo masculino. La propuesta se diseña con estrategias desde una visión integral desde uno de los subsistemas para el Talento Humano, en equipos de trabajo, con la finalidad de procurar una incidencia efectiva en corto y largo plazo que se ajusta al protocolo de riesgos psicosociales.
The present research was executed with teaching, administrative and workers of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas (PUCESE), the objective is to examine the psychosocial risk factors and their incidence on stress. The methodology used is qualitative quantitative, non-experimental, correlational and cross-sectional. In the methodology, the CoPsoQ-istas21(V2) method was used, for the first variable and the Maslach Burnout inventory (MBI) the burnout syndrome due to work stress assistance, the instruments have reliability, validity and relevance. The results validate the central hypothesis the psychosocial risk pace of work (93.5%) with stress levels (high) by sex, men X2 = 122.8 and Cramer's coefficient V = 212.8 acceptable association and women X2 = 11.9 and with V = 66.01 acceptable association.More favorable psychosocial risks for both sexes: development possibilities 85.4%, sense of work 82.1%, vertical confidence 90.2%, recognition 87%, justice 73.2%, demands to hide emotions 52.8%. The factors that affect most unfavorably: emotional demands 51.2%, social support from colleagues 58.5%, job insecurity 59.3%, insecurity about working conditions 60.2%, role conflict 61% and work rhythm 93.5%. High stress levels, female sex: Emotional fatigue (EC) 17%, Depersonalization (PD) 10% and Personal fulfillment (PR) 31%. Medium EC 30%, DP 34% and PR 32%. Low EC level 27%, DP 30% and PR 11%. For the male sex high PD 50%. Medium EC 9% and low level EC 41% and PR 50%. The conclusions indicate a higher incidence of psychosocial risk and stress for females versus males. The proposal is designed with strategies from a comprehensive vision from Human Talent, work teams and workers in order to ensure an effective impact in the short and long term that conforms to the protocol of psychosocial risks.
The present research was executed with teaching, administrative and workers of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas (PUCESE), the objective is to examine the psychosocial risk factors and their incidence on stress. The methodology used is qualitative quantitative, non-experimental, correlational and cross-sectional. In the methodology, the CoPsoQ-istas21(V2) method was used, for the first variable and the Maslach Burnout inventory (MBI) the burnout syndrome due to work stress assistance, the instruments have reliability, validity and relevance. The results validate the central hypothesis the psychosocial risk pace of work (93.5%) with stress levels (high) by sex, men X2 = 122.8 and Cramer's coefficient V = 212.8 acceptable association and women X2 = 11.9 and with V = 66.01 acceptable association.More favorable psychosocial risks for both sexes: development possibilities 85.4%, sense of work 82.1%, vertical confidence 90.2%, recognition 87%, justice 73.2%, demands to hide emotions 52.8%. The factors that affect most unfavorably: emotional demands 51.2%, social support from colleagues 58.5%, job insecurity 59.3%, insecurity about working conditions 60.2%, role conflict 61% and work rhythm 93.5%. High stress levels, female sex: Emotional fatigue (EC) 17%, Depersonalization (PD) 10% and Personal fulfillment (PR) 31%. Medium EC 30%, DP 34% and PR 32%. Low EC level 27%, DP 30% and PR 11%. For the male sex high PD 50%. Medium EC 9% and low level EC 41% and PR 50%. The conclusions indicate a higher incidence of psychosocial risk and stress for females versus males. The proposal is designed with strategies from a comprehensive vision from Human Talent, work teams and workers in order to ensure an effective impact in the short and long term that conforms to the protocol of psychosocial risks.
Description
Keywords
Factores de riesgo psicosocial, Estrés, Diestres, Cansancio emocional