La prescripción en el procedimiento especial de ejecución coactiva en la corporación nacional de telecomunicaciones CNT E.P. en el Ecuador
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La investigación analiza la validez de las inscripciones de resoluciones de justicia indígena en el Registro de la Propiedad y Mercantil del Cantón Cayambe entre 2017 y 2023, con el objetivo de determinar los principios y normas que sustentan dichas inscripciones y verificar su compatibilidad con el sistema registral ecuatoriano. El estudio se desarrolló bajo un enfoque mixto, integrando técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas para abordar los desafíos derivados del pluralismo jurídico en el ámbito registral. A través de la revisión documental de 40 resoluciones inscritas en el Libro de Inscripciones de Actos y Resoluciones Emanados de la Jurisdicción Indígena, se examinaron aspectos como la competencia jurisdiccional, el respeto al debido proceso y la naturaleza de la propiedad. Asimismo, entrevistas a funcionarios del registro permitieron identificar criterios y obstáculos en la calificación registral. Los resultados evidenciaron que no existe un marco normativo armonizado que respete la autonomía indígena, garantice la seguridad jurídica y fomente la compatibilidad entre los sistemas jurisdiccionales indígenas y sistema registral. Se recomienda crear estándares claros para la inscripción de resoluciones indígenas, capacitar a registradores en principios interculturales y promover espacios de diálogo entre jurisdicciones, fortaleciendo el pluralismo jurídico en Ecuador.
The research examines the validity of registering indigenous justice resolutions in the Property Registry of Cayambe, Ecuador, between 2017 and 2023. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study evaluates 40 registered resolutions to determine their compliance with jurisdictional competence, due process, and property norms. Interviews with registry officials further reveal the criteria and challenges associated with these registrations. The findings highlight a significant gap between the constitutional recognition of indigenous jurisdiction (Article 171) and the absence of a specific regulatory framework within the registry system. This misalignment leads to tensions, inconsistent practices, and challenges such as insufficient due process verification and decisions exceeding indigenous jurisdiction. While the Cayambe Registry addressed this issue by creating a specialized registry book, ambiguities in Constitutional Court rulings continue to limit property decisions to community lands, weakening collective land protections. The study concludes that a harmonized framework is essential to uphold indigenous autonomy, ensure legal security, and integrate these resolutions into the registry system. Recommendations include establishing clear guidelines for indigenous resolution registrations, training registrars on intercultural principles, and fostering dialogue between jurisdictions to strengthen legal pluralism in Ecuador.
The research examines the validity of registering indigenous justice resolutions in the Property Registry of Cayambe, Ecuador, between 2017 and 2023. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study evaluates 40 registered resolutions to determine their compliance with jurisdictional competence, due process, and property norms. Interviews with registry officials further reveal the criteria and challenges associated with these registrations. The findings highlight a significant gap between the constitutional recognition of indigenous jurisdiction (Article 171) and the absence of a specific regulatory framework within the registry system. This misalignment leads to tensions, inconsistent practices, and challenges such as insufficient due process verification and decisions exceeding indigenous jurisdiction. While the Cayambe Registry addressed this issue by creating a specialized registry book, ambiguities in Constitutional Court rulings continue to limit property decisions to community lands, weakening collective land protections. The study concludes that a harmonized framework is essential to uphold indigenous autonomy, ensure legal security, and integrate these resolutions into the registry system. Recommendations include establishing clear guidelines for indigenous resolution registrations, training registrars on intercultural principles, and fostering dialogue between jurisdictions to strengthen legal pluralism in Ecuador.
Description
Keywords
Justicia indígena, Registro, Pluralismo, Interculturalidad, Transferencia de propiedad