Análisis comparativo entre los delitos de enriquecimiento ilícito y enriquecimiento no justificado en la legislación ecuatoriana
Authors
Ocles Insuasti, Amanda Julissa
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
El objeto de la presente investigación es hacer un análisis comparativo entre dos tipos penales puesto que se necesita investigar a fondo la problemática de enriquecerse ilegalmente, ambos conceptos buscan combatir la corrupción, aunque con enfoques ligeramente diferentes. El objetivo general de este trabajo investigativo, fue comparar los delitos de enriquecimiento ilícito y enriquecimiento no justificado en la legislación ecuatoriana, a través del análisis de la tipificación en el Código Orgánico Integral Penal, sus semejanzas y diferencias, además, del estudio de casos emblemáticos y notables para la sociedad ecuatoriana, con el fin de comprender su impacto en la efectividad en la persecución de la corrupción. La investigación se desarrolló desde un enfoque cualitativo con un alcance descriptivo debido a que se analiza los aspectos más importantes y relevantes de los delitos y su incidencia que está en aumento. Se aplicó el método analítico para comparar los tipos penales descritos en las normas estudiadas; de igual manera, se utilizó el método jurídico comparativo para poder confrontar los diversos elementos que conforman ambos delitos, a fin de contrastar ambas realidades legales. Además, se hizo uso del método normativista, por ser éste el adecuado para analizar las normas jurídicas que consagran los tipos penales indicados. De la información obtenida a través de las técnicas e instrumentos utilizados se pudo evidenciar que existe aumento progresivo en el incremento de patrimonio de los funcionarios públicos y de particulares de una manera ilegal e injustificada; afectando al buen desarrollo de la administración pública como bien jurídico protegido y a la sociedad, lo que da relevancia y pertinencia a este trabajo. Se concluyo que las sentencias dictaminadas por casos de enriquecimiento no son justas ni equitativas por el daño causado además existe interferencia en el poder judicial ocasionando un perjuicio económico al país y a la sociedad.
The objetive of this research is to make a comparative analysis between two criminal types since it is necessary to investigate in depth the problem of illegally enriching oneself, both concepts seek to combat corruption, although with slightly different approaches. The general objective of this research work was to compare the crimes of illicit enrichment and unjustified enrichment in Ecuadorian legislation, through the analysis of the typification in the Organic Integral Penal Code, their similarities and differences, in addition to the study of emblematic and notable cases for the Ecuadorian society, to understand their impact on the effectiveness of the prosecution of corruption. The research was developed from a qualitative approach with a descriptive scope because it analyzes the most important and relevant aspects of the crimes and their increasing incidence. The analytical method was applied to analyze the criminal types described in the norms studied; likewise, the comparative legal method was used to compare the various elements that make up both crimes, to contrast both legal realities. In addition, the Normative method was used, as it is the appropriate method to analyze the legal norms that enshrine the criminal types indicated. From the information obtained through the techniques and instruments used, it could be evidenced that there is a progressive increase in the increase of assets of public officials and individuals in an illegal and unjustified manner; affecting the good development of public administration as a protected legal good and society, which makes this work relevant. It was concluded that the sentences issued for cases of enrichment are not fair and equitable because of the damage caused and there is also interference in the judiciary causing economic damage to the country and society.
The objetive of this research is to make a comparative analysis between two criminal types since it is necessary to investigate in depth the problem of illegally enriching oneself, both concepts seek to combat corruption, although with slightly different approaches. The general objective of this research work was to compare the crimes of illicit enrichment and unjustified enrichment in Ecuadorian legislation, through the analysis of the typification in the Organic Integral Penal Code, their similarities and differences, in addition to the study of emblematic and notable cases for the Ecuadorian society, to understand their impact on the effectiveness of the prosecution of corruption. The research was developed from a qualitative approach with a descriptive scope because it analyzes the most important and relevant aspects of the crimes and their increasing incidence. The analytical method was applied to analyze the criminal types described in the norms studied; likewise, the comparative legal method was used to compare the various elements that make up both crimes, to contrast both legal realities. In addition, the Normative method was used, as it is the appropriate method to analyze the legal norms that enshrine the criminal types indicated. From the information obtained through the techniques and instruments used, it could be evidenced that there is a progressive increase in the increase of assets of public officials and individuals in an illegal and unjustified manner; affecting the good development of public administration as a protected legal good and society, which makes this work relevant. It was concluded that the sentences issued for cases of enrichment are not fair and equitable because of the damage caused and there is also interference in the judiciary causing economic damage to the country and society.
Description
Keywords
Enriquecimiento ilícito, Enriquecimiento no justificado, Código orgánico integral penal, Corrupción