La razonabilidad de la declaratoria de inconstitucionalidad de la preferencia materna en casos de tenencia: Estudio de la Sentencia de la Corte Constitucional No. 28-15-IN
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La presente investigación adopta un enfoque cualitativo que posibilita un análisis más profundo de la problemática planteada. A través del examen documental, se pone de manifiesto la imperante necesidad de examinar la Sentencia 28-15-IN/21 emitida por la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador, centrándose en un análisis exhaustivo de diversas instituciones jurídicas, especialmente en lo concerniente a la tenencia en el contexto ecuatoriano. La declaración de inconstitucionalidad altera las normativas de una figura que ha tenido gran importancia en los tribunales de familia, particularmente después de los asuntos vinculados al régimen de alimentos. Este trabajo se fundamenta en el análisis jurídico y doctrinal de principios constitucionales como el interés superior del niño, la coparentalidad, la corresponsabilidad parental y aspectos sensibles que deben ser considerados en un sistema patriarcal, como la violencia hacia la mujer y su papel de género establecido como cuidadoras por excelencia. Sin embargo, el foco principal recae en el estudio y determinación de los criterios y argumentos de los jueces de la Corte. Además, se examina la razonabilidad y motivación de la sentencia a través del análisis de los principios constitucionales y la necesidad de asegurar los derechos de los niños y adolescentes en un marco de protección y derechos.
This research adopts a qualitative approach that allows for a deeper analysis of the problem raised. Through the documentary review, the imperative need to examine Ruling 28-15- IN/21 issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador is revealed, focusing on an exhaustive analysis of various legal institutions, especially with regard to tenancy in the Ecuadorian context. The declaration of unconstitutionality alters the regulations of a figure that has had great importance in the family courts, particularly after matters related to the maintenance regime. This work is based on the doctrinal analysis of constitutional principles such as the best interests of the child, co-parenting, parental co-responsibility and sensitive aspects that must be considered in a patriarchal system, such as vicarious violence and the gender role assigned to women. However, the main focus is on the study and determination of the criteria and arguments of the judges of the Court. In addition, the reasonableness and motivation of the sentence is examined through the analysis of constitutional principles and the need to ensure the rights of children and adolescents in a framework of protection and rights.
This research adopts a qualitative approach that allows for a deeper analysis of the problem raised. Through the documentary review, the imperative need to examine Ruling 28-15- IN/21 issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador is revealed, focusing on an exhaustive analysis of various legal institutions, especially with regard to tenancy in the Ecuadorian context. The declaration of unconstitutionality alters the regulations of a figure that has had great importance in the family courts, particularly after matters related to the maintenance regime. This work is based on the doctrinal analysis of constitutional principles such as the best interests of the child, co-parenting, parental co-responsibility and sensitive aspects that must be considered in a patriarchal system, such as vicarious violence and the gender role assigned to women. However, the main focus is on the study and determination of the criteria and arguments of the judges of the Court. In addition, the reasonableness and motivation of the sentence is examined through the analysis of constitutional principles and the need to ensure the rights of children and adolescents in a framework of protection and rights.
Description
Keywords
Razonabilidad, Motivación, Inconstitucionalidad, Igualdad, No discriminación, Tenencia, Patria potestad, Niñez y adolescencia, Preferencia materna