Análisis de los efectos jurídicos en la República del Ecuador respecto de la opinión consultiva número 24 que dictó la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos '
Loading...
Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
El Análisis de los efectos jurídicos en la República del Ecuador respecto a la opinión
consultiva 24 dictada por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos surge ante la
aceptación de la misma dentro de la legislación nacional contenida en la sentencia No.
11-18-CN/19 dictada por la Corte Constitucional de Justicia de Ecuador siendo este su
principal efecto jurídico, el mismo que responde al objetivo general, de la misma manera
se cumple los objetivos específicos como la conceptualización de una opinión consultiva,
la determinación de la misma como un instrumento internacional y su vinculación y
valoración jurídica en el Ecuador.
A través del desarrollo de esta indagación se concreta una respuesta a la pregunta de
investigación estableciendo, así como principal efecto jurídico de la Opinión Consultiva
en Ecuador a la sentencia No. 11-18-CN/19 que legaliza el derecho al matrimonio para
parejas homosexuales, además de necesarias reformas, estudios y ampliaciones de la
normativa interna vinculada al matrimonio y aspectos a futuro derivados del mismo
origen como puede ser la adopción. La presente indagación fue elaborada con un enfoque
cualitativo utilizando el método lógico analítico y hermenéutico, además técnicas para
identificar los resultados como el análisis documental y entrevista. No se consideró
necesaria la reforma constitucional en su Art. 64 ya que la opinión consultiva 24/17 es
complementaria con lo establecido en la sentencia No. 11-18-CN/19.
The Analysis of the legal effects in the Republic of Ecuador regarding the advisory opinion 24 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights arises from its acceptance within the national legislation contained in judgment No. 11-18-CN / 19 issued by the Constitutional Court of Justice of Ecuador, this being its main legal effect, the same that responds to the general objective, in the same way, the specific objectives such as the conceptualization of an advisory opinion, the determination of it as an international instrument and its link and legal assessment in Ecuador. Through the development of this investigation, a response to the research question is specified, establishing, as well as the main legal effect of the Advisory Opinion in Ecuador, to sentence No. 11-18-CN / 19 that legalizes the right to marriage for homosexual couples, in addition to necessary reforms, studies and extensions of the internal regulations related to marriage and future aspects derived from the same origin such as adoption. The present investigation was elaborated with a qualitative approach using the analytical and hermeneutical logical method, in addition to techniques to identify the results such as documentary analysis and interview. The constitutional reform in Article 64 was not considered necessary since advisory opinion 24/17 is complementary to what is established in judgment No. 11-18-CN / 19.
The Analysis of the legal effects in the Republic of Ecuador regarding the advisory opinion 24 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights arises from its acceptance within the national legislation contained in judgment No. 11-18-CN / 19 issued by the Constitutional Court of Justice of Ecuador, this being its main legal effect, the same that responds to the general objective, in the same way, the specific objectives such as the conceptualization of an advisory opinion, the determination of it as an international instrument and its link and legal assessment in Ecuador. Through the development of this investigation, a response to the research question is specified, establishing, as well as the main legal effect of the Advisory Opinion in Ecuador, to sentence No. 11-18-CN / 19 that legalizes the right to marriage for homosexual couples, in addition to necessary reforms, studies and extensions of the internal regulations related to marriage and future aspects derived from the same origin such as adoption. The present investigation was elaborated with a qualitative approach using the analytical and hermeneutical logical method, in addition to techniques to identify the results such as documentary analysis and interview. The constitutional reform in Article 64 was not considered necessary since advisory opinion 24/17 is complementary to what is established in judgment No. 11-18-CN / 19.
Description
Keywords
Corte constitucional, Efectos legales, Matrimonio, Efectos vinculantes