Análisis sobre los motivos por los cuales se restringe presentar una Acción Extraordinaria de Protección frente a las decisiones emanadas por el Tribunal Contencioso Electoral durante el periodo de elecciones
Loading...
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
Esta investigación se basa en el análisis de una de las garantías jurisdiccionales, que es la
Acción Extraordinaria de Protección, y está centrado en la limitación del artículo 62 numeral
7 de la LOGJCC, donde se limita interponer una acción extraordinaria de protección frente
a las decisiones emanadas por el Tribunal Contencioso Electoral en el periodo de elecciones.
La limitación de la LOGJCC es muy debatible con respeto a si es constitucional o no, ya que
existen varios criterios frente a este tema de investigación, uno de ellos se refiere a que dicha
limitante es inconstitucional porque no estaría amparando la protección de todos los
derechos constitucionales, otro de los criterios es que es totalmente acertada la limitación ya
que existe un órgano especializado que está velando por los derechos electorales, el objetivo
primordial de la investigación es encontrar los motivos por lo que no es procedente presentar
una acción extraordinaria de protección frente las decisiones emanadas por el Tribunal
Contencioso Electoral en el periodo de elecciones, para esta investigación se abordará desde
un enfoque cualitativo mismo que encaminará a dar respuestas a la pregunta de
investigación, la solución que se obtuvo frente a la problemática establecida es que debe de
haber una reforma a la LOGJCC ya que al no admitir la acción extraordinaria de protección
se esta vulnerando derechos constitucionales y no se está cumpliendo con los establecido en
la CRE y así dejando a los sujetos políticos en indefensión.
This investigation is based on the analysis of one of the jurisdictional guarantees which is the Extraordinary Action of Protection, this one is focused on the limitation of the article 62 numeral 7 of the LOGJCC, where it is limited to file an extraordinary action of protection against the decisions issued by the Contentious Electoral Tribunal during the election period. The limitation of the LOGJCC is highly arguable regarding whether it is constitutional or not, due to there are several criteria concerning this topic of investigation, one of them refers that the limitation is unconstitutional because it would not be protecting all the constitutional rights, another of the criteria is this limitation is totally correct since there is a specialized structure which is watching over electoral rights, the primordial objective of the investigation is to find the reasons why it is not appropriate to present an extraordinary action of protection against the decisions issued by the Electoral Contentious Tribunal in the election period, for this investigation, it will be approached from a qualitative approach which will lead to give answers to the research question; the solution that was obtained against to the stablished problem is that there must be a reform to the LOGJCC since by not admitting the extraordinary action of protection, the constitutional rights are being violated and it is not complied with the stablished on the CRE, leaving defenseless political subjects.
This investigation is based on the analysis of one of the jurisdictional guarantees which is the Extraordinary Action of Protection, this one is focused on the limitation of the article 62 numeral 7 of the LOGJCC, where it is limited to file an extraordinary action of protection against the decisions issued by the Contentious Electoral Tribunal during the election period. The limitation of the LOGJCC is highly arguable regarding whether it is constitutional or not, due to there are several criteria concerning this topic of investigation, one of them refers that the limitation is unconstitutional because it would not be protecting all the constitutional rights, another of the criteria is this limitation is totally correct since there is a specialized structure which is watching over electoral rights, the primordial objective of the investigation is to find the reasons why it is not appropriate to present an extraordinary action of protection against the decisions issued by the Electoral Contentious Tribunal in the election period, for this investigation, it will be approached from a qualitative approach which will lead to give answers to the research question; the solution that was obtained against to the stablished problem is that there must be a reform to the LOGJCC since by not admitting the extraordinary action of protection, the constitutional rights are being violated and it is not complied with the stablished on the CRE, leaving defenseless political subjects.
Description
Keywords
Acción, Extraordinaria, Protección, Participación