La motivación como garantía constitucional en la Jurisprudencia Nacional: análisis de la sentencia no. 751-15-EP/21
Loading...
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La motivación es una garantía constitucional que forma parte del debido proceso y de la tutela judicial efectiva en el derecho ecuatoriano, que debe cumplirse en todos los niveles de la administración de justicia nacional, cuyo desacato ocasionaría vulneraciones de las garantías procesales. Esta investigación se tituló La motivación como garantía constitucional en la jurisprudencia nacional: análisis de la sentencia no. 751-15-EP/21, la cual centró su interés en las decisiones judiciales deficitarias de motivación, las cuales causarían violaciones a los derechos de las personas y precariedad de seguridad jurídica en el país. Ante esta situación a nivel nacional, la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador decidió intervenir con su jurisprudencia y expidió el Test de Motivación, con la finalidad de que los jueces produzcan sentencias claras, en el menor tiempo posible, concisas, precisas, entendibles y con el menor número de acciones impugnadoras. Esta fue una investigación documental, con un enfoque cualitativo y un nivel de profundidad descriptivo, cuyos métodos utilizado fueron el normativista y el hermenéutico. El objetivo general de este trabajo fue determinar el cumplimiento de la motivación como garantía constitucional en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer y segundo nivel en el Ecuador, tomando como referencia la sentencia No. 751-15-EP/21 de la Corte Constitucional. Entre los resultados obtenidos de la comparación de las sentencias, se observó que los jueces de primer y segundo nivel no han motivado sus sentencias, aún cuando es su deber y existiendo la normativa interna que establece esta garantía. En conclusión, esta investigación determinó el déficit de motivación de las sentencias en ambos niveles del Poder Judicial Nacional.
The motivation is a constitutional guarantee that is part of both due process and effective judicial protection in Ecuadorian law, which must be complied with at all levels of the national justice administration, whose contempt would cause violations of procedural guarantees. This research was titled Motivation as a constitutional guarantee in national jurisprudence: analysis of judgment no. 751-15-EP / 21”, which focused its interest on judicial decisions lacking in motivation, which would cause violations of people's rights and precarious legal security in the country. Faced with this situation at the national level, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador decided to intervene with its jurisprudence and issued the Motivation Test, in order for the judges to produce clear sentences, in the shortest possible time, concise, precise, understandable and with the least possible number of challenging actions. This was a documentary research, with a qualitative approach and a descriptive depth level, whose methods used were the normativist and the hermeneutical. The general objective of this work was to determine compliance with the motivation as a constitutional guarantee in the judgments issued by the first and second level judges in Ecuador, taking as a reference judgment No. 751-15-EP / 21 of the Constitutional Court. Among the results obtained from the comparison of the judgements, it was observed that the first and second level judges have not given reasons for their judgements, even though it is their duty and there is the national legislation that establishes this guarantee. In conclusion, this investigation determined the lack of motivation of the sentences at both levels of the National Judiciary.
The motivation is a constitutional guarantee that is part of both due process and effective judicial protection in Ecuadorian law, which must be complied with at all levels of the national justice administration, whose contempt would cause violations of procedural guarantees. This research was titled Motivation as a constitutional guarantee in national jurisprudence: analysis of judgment no. 751-15-EP / 21”, which focused its interest on judicial decisions lacking in motivation, which would cause violations of people's rights and precarious legal security in the country. Faced with this situation at the national level, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador decided to intervene with its jurisprudence and issued the Motivation Test, in order for the judges to produce clear sentences, in the shortest possible time, concise, precise, understandable and with the least possible number of challenging actions. This was a documentary research, with a qualitative approach and a descriptive depth level, whose methods used were the normativist and the hermeneutical. The general objective of this work was to determine compliance with the motivation as a constitutional guarantee in the judgments issued by the first and second level judges in Ecuador, taking as a reference judgment No. 751-15-EP / 21 of the Constitutional Court. Among the results obtained from the comparison of the judgements, it was observed that the first and second level judges have not given reasons for their judgements, even though it is their duty and there is the national legislation that establishes this guarantee. In conclusion, this investigation determined the lack of motivation of the sentences at both levels of the National Judiciary.
Description
Keywords
Motivación, Garantía constitucional, Jurisprudencia, Sentencias