Impugnación de reconocimiento voluntario de paternidad, por vía de nulidad del acto
Loading...
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
Este trabajo se tituló Impugnación de reconocimiento voluntario de paternidad, por vía de
nulidad del acto, cuyo objetivo general fue analizar los vicios del consentimiento que
pueden surgir al impugnar la forma jurídica de la disputa sobre el consentimiento voluntario
del padre por la nulidad del acto, en este caso sería por el error, dolo y fuerza, qué son los
vicios del consentimiento y para que los actos de voluntad sean legalmente válidos deben
cumplir ciertos requisitos básicos. También explicó quién es el juez competente para conocer
estos casos, porque hay dos tendencias muy claras: una dice que el juez competente para
conocer este caso es un juez de familia, mujer, niñez, adolescencia y jóvenes infractores, otra
opinión que el juez responsable de esta acción es un Juez Civil. Los métodos utilizados fue
el normativista y el analítico, mismos que permitieron alcanzar los objetivos propuestos y
desglosar los distintos elementos que componen el perfil jurídico de la impugnación al
reconocimiento voluntario de la paternidad por nulidad del acto, para poder analizarlos por
separados e identificar los diversos vicios del consentimiento. Esta investigación es
importante porque centró su interés en una temática relacionada con los derechos de los
niños, niñas y adolescentes y, en virtud del objetivo propuesto, este estudio tendrá un impacto
significativo en la sociedad, ya que es un problema social existente y que se agrava, pero en
muchos casos la persona interesada puede negarse a ejercer este derecho, posiblemente por
desconocimiento de la ley, disposiciones de algunos juristas que, posiblemente, no pueden
ofrecer una solución al asunto. Finalmente, se cuestiona la figura jurídica del reconocimiento
voluntario de los padres como plenamente válida y basada únicamente en la nulidad de un
acto realizado para demostrar que no se han cumplido los requisitos para el reconocimiento
voluntario de la paternidad.
This work was entitled 'Challenging voluntary recognition of paternity, by way of nullity of the act', whose general objective was to analyze the vices of consent that may arise when challenging the legal form of the dispute over the voluntary consent of the father for the nullity of the act, in this case it would be due to intent and force error what are the vices of consent and for acts of will to be legally valid they must meet certain basic requirements. He also explained who is the competent judge to hear these cases, because there are two very clear tendencies: one says that the competent judge to hear this case is a judge of family, women, childhood, adolescence, and young offenders\; and another opinion that the judge responsible for this action is a Civil Judge. The methods used were normative and analytical, which allowed the proposed objectives to be achieved and to break down the different elements that make up the legal profile of the challenge to the voluntary recognition of paternity for nullity of the act, in order to analyze them separately and identify the various vices of consent. This research is important because it focused its interest on a topic related to the rights of minors and, by virtue of the proposed objective, this study will have a significant impact on society, since it is an existing social problem that is getting worse, but in In many cases, the person concerned may refuse to exercise this right, possibly due to ignorance of the law, provisions of some jurists that possibly cannot offer a solution to the matter. Finally, the legal concept of voluntary acknowledgment of parents is questioned as fully valid and based solely on the nullity of an act carried out to demonstrate that the requirements for voluntary acknowledgment of paternity have not been met.
This work was entitled 'Challenging voluntary recognition of paternity, by way of nullity of the act', whose general objective was to analyze the vices of consent that may arise when challenging the legal form of the dispute over the voluntary consent of the father for the nullity of the act, in this case it would be due to intent and force error what are the vices of consent and for acts of will to be legally valid they must meet certain basic requirements. He also explained who is the competent judge to hear these cases, because there are two very clear tendencies: one says that the competent judge to hear this case is a judge of family, women, childhood, adolescence, and young offenders\; and another opinion that the judge responsible for this action is a Civil Judge. The methods used were normative and analytical, which allowed the proposed objectives to be achieved and to break down the different elements that make up the legal profile of the challenge to the voluntary recognition of paternity for nullity of the act, in order to analyze them separately and identify the various vices of consent. This research is important because it focused its interest on a topic related to the rights of minors and, by virtue of the proposed objective, this study will have a significant impact on society, since it is an existing social problem that is getting worse, but in In many cases, the person concerned may refuse to exercise this right, possibly due to ignorance of the law, provisions of some jurists that possibly cannot offer a solution to the matter. Finally, the legal concept of voluntary acknowledgment of parents is questioned as fully valid and based solely on the nullity of an act carried out to demonstrate that the requirements for voluntary acknowledgment of paternity have not been met.
Description
Keywords
Impugnación, Reconocimiento, Voluntario, Paternidad