Ejecutoriedad de sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos por parte del estado ecuatoriano
Loading...
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos se creó con la finalidad de protección, tutela y garantía de los Derechos Humanos de la población de los Estados que conforman la OEA (Organización de las Estados Americanos) y que ratifican la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos; este organismo se constituye como herramienta para garantizar la eficacia y eficiencia del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos humanos. Las sentencias de la Corte IDH son de carácter erga omnes lo que significa que están dirigidas para todos en general; cabe hacer alusión que dentro del SIDH se da la ausencia de un mecanismo de coerción para que se dé la efectiva ejecutoriedad de las mismas, a pesar de que su cumplimiento es obligatorio y el Sistema de Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencias es el encargado de que esto suceda a cabalidad; pues se trata más de la voluntad de los Estados para que todas las sentencias y medidas de reparación sean ejecutadas en su totalidad y se puedan resarcir los derechos humanos violentados. El Ecuador al ratificar la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos se obliga a cumplir todo lo que decrete la Corte IDH en las sentencias en las que el Estado es parte y ha sido declarado responsable por lo tanto deberá acatar las medidas de reparación que la Corte le ordene. Dentro de la investigación se analizó las sentencias del período 2015-2018 (caso Vásquez Durand y otros, caso Valencia Hinojosa, caso Herrera Espinoza y otros, caso Flor Freire, caso García Ibarra; y el caso Gonzales Lluy y otros) observando cómo es su cumplimiento por parte del Ecuador y de qué manera se están aplicando las medidas de reparación, análisis que resulta de la verificación de los informes de supervisión de cumplimiento.
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights was created with the purpose of protection, guardianship and guarantee of Human Rights of the population of the States that make up the OAS (Organization of American States) and that ratify the American Convention on Human Rights; This body is constituted as a tool to guarantee the effectiveness and efficiency of the Inter-American Human Rights System. The judgments of the Inter-American Court are erga omnes, which means that they are aimed at everyone in general, in addition, compliance with them is mandatory and it is the Monitoring System for Compliance with Judgments that ensures that this happens fully, that is, that all sentences and reparation measures be fully executed by the States part and that the violated human rights be compensated. By ratifying the American Convention on Human Rights, Ecuador undertakes to execute with everything that the Inter-American Court decrees in the judgments in which the State is part and has been declared responsable, therefore, it must abide by the reparation measures ordered by the Court. Within the investigation, the judgments of the 2015-2018 period were analyzed (the Vásquez Durand et al. Case, the Valencia Hinojosa case, the Herrera Espinoza et al. Case, the Flor Freire case, the García Ibarra case; and the Gonzales Lluy et al. Case), observing how their compliance by Ecuador and how the reparation measures are being applied, an analysis that results from the verification of the compliance supervision reports.
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights was created with the purpose of protection, guardianship and guarantee of Human Rights of the population of the States that make up the OAS (Organization of American States) and that ratify the American Convention on Human Rights; This body is constituted as a tool to guarantee the effectiveness and efficiency of the Inter-American Human Rights System. The judgments of the Inter-American Court are erga omnes, which means that they are aimed at everyone in general, in addition, compliance with them is mandatory and it is the Monitoring System for Compliance with Judgments that ensures that this happens fully, that is, that all sentences and reparation measures be fully executed by the States part and that the violated human rights be compensated. By ratifying the American Convention on Human Rights, Ecuador undertakes to execute with everything that the Inter-American Court decrees in the judgments in which the State is part and has been declared responsable, therefore, it must abide by the reparation measures ordered by the Court. Within the investigation, the judgments of the 2015-2018 period were analyzed (the Vásquez Durand et al. Case, the Valencia Hinojosa case, the Herrera Espinoza et al. Case, the Flor Freire case, the García Ibarra case; and the Gonzales Lluy et al. Case), observing how their compliance by Ecuador and how the reparation measures are being applied, an analysis that results from the verification of the compliance supervision reports.
Description
Keywords
Sentencias, Medidas, Reparación, Corte