Ineficacia de la acción de repetición por la Indemnización en el Caso Corte Suprema de Justicia Vs. Ecuador
Loading...
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
El presente trabajo de investigación se encamina a realizar el análisis de la acción de repetición No. 17811-2016-01097 iniciada en el año 2016 por la indemnización dispuesta al Estado ecuatoriano como parte de la sentencia de 23 de agosto de 2013 emitida por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos dentro del caso Corte Suprema de Justicia Vs. Ecuador, presentada como consecuencia del cese ilegal de funciones de los magistrados de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en el año 2004, y la investigación realizada tiene la finalidad de determinar los motivos de la ineficacia de la mencionada acción, sus consecuencias y las recomendaciones que se plantean para darle soluciones a la problemática investigada, siendo la pregunta principal de la investigación: ¿cuál es el motivo de la ineficacia de las acciones de repetición en el Estado ecuatoriano?. El objetivo principal es determinar las razones del incumplimiento de la acción de repetición establecida en el Art. 67 y siguientes de la LOGJCC, utilizando los métodos científico, analítico, socio jurídico, con un nivel descriptivo de la legislación y los documentos revisados, siendo las principales conclusiones: es la falta de impulso procesal, de atención y debida diligencia a la causa lo que provoca la ineficacia de acción de repetición analizada.
The present degree work is the one correspondent to the analysis of the repetition action No. 17811-2016-01097 currently being processed in the District Court of Administrative Litigation Headquartered in the Metropolitan District of Quito, in 2016 for the compensation ordered to the Ecuadorian State as part of the judgment of August 23, 2013 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of the Supreme Court of Justice v. Ecuador, presented as a consequence of the illegal cessation of functions of the magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice in 2004, and the investigation carried out has the purpose of determining the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the aforementioned action, as well as its motives, consequences and the recommendations that are raised to provide solutions to the problem investigated, being the main question of the research: what is the reason for the ineffectiveness of the repetition actions in the Ecuadorian State ?. The main objective is to determine the reasons for the non-compliance of the repetition action established in Art. 67 et seq. of the LOGJCC, using scientific, analytical, socio-legal methods, with a descriptive level of the legislation and the documents reviewed, being the main conclusions: it is the lack of procedural impulse, attention and due diligence to the cause that causes the ineffectiveness of the action of repetition analyzed.
The present degree work is the one correspondent to the analysis of the repetition action No. 17811-2016-01097 currently being processed in the District Court of Administrative Litigation Headquartered in the Metropolitan District of Quito, in 2016 for the compensation ordered to the Ecuadorian State as part of the judgment of August 23, 2013 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of the Supreme Court of Justice v. Ecuador, presented as a consequence of the illegal cessation of functions of the magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice in 2004, and the investigation carried out has the purpose of determining the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the aforementioned action, as well as its motives, consequences and the recommendations that are raised to provide solutions to the problem investigated, being the main question of the research: what is the reason for the ineffectiveness of the repetition actions in the Ecuadorian State ?. The main objective is to determine the reasons for the non-compliance of the repetition action established in Art. 67 et seq. of the LOGJCC, using scientific, analytical, socio-legal methods, with a descriptive level of the legislation and the documents reviewed, being the main conclusions: it is the lack of procedural impulse, attention and due diligence to the cause that causes the ineffectiveness of the action of repetition analyzed.
Description
Keywords
Derecho, Repetición, Ineficacia, Vulneración