La sana critica en la valoración de la prueba para declarar la existencia de unión de hecho
Authors
Ortega Mejía, Karla Juliana
Loading...
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
El presente artículo ha tenido como objetivo principal abordar la sana crítica en la valoración de la prueba para declarar la existencia de unión de hecho en el Estado ecuatoriano, desde la teleología mediante la indagación científica pretende generar conocimiento sobre las reglas de la sana crítica y la aplicabilidad dentro de la actividad probatoria que concibe el órgano jurisdiccional competente. Para el desarrollo pleno del análisis presente se tomó en cuenta el criterio de los jueces de la Unidad Judicial de Familia, Mujer, Niñez y Adolescencia y Adolescentes Infractores con Sede en el cantón Ibarra, quienes están encargados de administrar justicia en esta rama del derecho, obteniendo precisiones importantes de la sana critica en la práctica del derecho, de esta forma se empleó el enfoque cualitativo con nivel de profundidad descriptivo, teniendo como resultados identificación de la pertinencia de la sana critica como herramienta para motivar las sentencias emitidas por los jueces. Por tanto, de conformidad con el estudio realizado, se concluyó que no existe algún lineamiento que se deba seguir para emitir la sana critica, por lo tanto, se desarrolla esta investigación con la pretensión de dar a conocer de manera objetiva y sistematizada las reglas de la sana critica que no están regladas, sino que se efectúan por medio del conocimiento del derecho y la noción de justicia, que en adelante servirá para mejorar la calidad de la apreciación jurídica de la prueba.
The main objective of this article has been to address sound criticism in the evaluation of the evidence to declare the existence of a de facto union in the ecuadorian State, from teleology through scientific inquiry, it aims to generate knowledge about the rules of sound criticism and applicability within the evidentiary activity conceived by the competent court. For the full development of the present analysis, the criteria of the judges of the Judicial Unit of Family, Women, Children and Adolescents and Adolescents offenders with headquarters in the Ibarra Canton were taken into account, who are in charge of administering justice in this branch of law, Obtaining important details of sound criticism in the practice of law, in this way the qualitative approach was used with a level of descriptive depth, having as results the identification of the relevance of sound criticism as a tool to motivate the sentences issued by the judges. Therefore, in accordance with the study carried out, it was concluded that there is no guideline that must be followed to issue sound criticism, therefore, this research is carried out with the aim of making known in an objective and systematized way the rules of the healthy criticism that are not regulated, but are carried out through knowledge of the law and the notion of justice, which from now on will serve to improve the quality of the legal assessment of the evidence.
The main objective of this article has been to address sound criticism in the evaluation of the evidence to declare the existence of a de facto union in the ecuadorian State, from teleology through scientific inquiry, it aims to generate knowledge about the rules of sound criticism and applicability within the evidentiary activity conceived by the competent court. For the full development of the present analysis, the criteria of the judges of the Judicial Unit of Family, Women, Children and Adolescents and Adolescents offenders with headquarters in the Ibarra Canton were taken into account, who are in charge of administering justice in this branch of law, Obtaining important details of sound criticism in the practice of law, in this way the qualitative approach was used with a level of descriptive depth, having as results the identification of the relevance of sound criticism as a tool to motivate the sentences issued by the judges. Therefore, in accordance with the study carried out, it was concluded that there is no guideline that must be followed to issue sound criticism, therefore, this research is carried out with the aim of making known in an objective and systematized way the rules of the healthy criticism that are not regulated, but are carried out through knowledge of the law and the notion of justice, which from now on will serve to improve the quality of the legal assessment of the evidence.
Description
Keywords
Sana critica, Unión de hecho, Teleología, Actividad