El pluralismo jurídico y el estado constitucional de derechos de la República del Ecuador
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La presente investigación denominada el pluralismo jurídico y el Estado Constitucional de Derechos de la República del Ecuador, tuvo como objetivo general, determinar la eficacia del pluralismo jurídico en el Estado constitucional de derecho y justicia de la República del Ecuador, a través de un enfoque cualitativo, mediante un nivel descriptivo, un método normativista y la aplicación de la técnica documental y de la entrevista, teniendo como resultado principal que para garantizar las justicias indígenas como parte del pluralismo jurídico, los derechos humanos, el debido proceso, la tutela paritaria, principales parámetros jurisprudenciales de la Corte Constitucional sobre las justicias indígenas y reglas específicas sobre la prevalencia de las justicias indígenas sobre la justicia ordinaria en razón de las normas nacionales e internacionales que regulan las justicias indígenas, se requiere de una adecuada coordinación y coexistencia entre la justicia consuetudinaria y normativa constitucional, internacional y nacional, pero además de una ley especial que permita abarcar todos aquellos lineamientos, limites, prohibiciones, garantías, jurisprudencia sobre la protección de los derechos colectivos de los pueblos y nacionalidades indígenas, sin dejar, de desconocer la diversidad de normas ancestrales y consuetudinarias, que son parte de su derecho propio, logrando concluir que la pluralidad jurídica requiere de parámetros normativos en base a una protección adecuada a los derechos humanos por parte de las autoridades indígenas, para así determinar su eficacia en el Estado Constitucional de Derechos, plurinacional, intercultural y la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional, a nivel lingüístico, jurídico, económico, político y social, en razón del artículo 171 de la Carta Magna.
The present investigation called legal pluralism and the Constitutional State of Rights of the Republic of Ecuador, had as a general objective; determine the effectiveness of legal pluralism in the constitutional State of law and justice of the Republic of Ecuador, through a qualitative approach, through a descriptive level, a normative method and the application of the documentary technique and the interview, having as a result The main thing is that in order to guarantee legal pluralism, human rights, due process, the social unity of the State and the national and international norms that regulate indigenous justice, adequate coordination and cooperation between ordinary and customary justice is required, but also of a special law that allows covering all those guidelines, limits, prohibitions, guarantees, jurisprudence that encompasses the protection of the collective rights of indigenous peoples and nationalities, without failing to ignore the diversity of ancestral and customary norms, which are part of its own right, managing to conclude that legal plurality requires of normative parameters based on an adequate protection of human rights by the indigenous authorities, in order to determine its effectiveness in the Constitutional State of Rights, plurinational, intercultural and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, at a linguistic, legal, economic level , political and social, by reason of article 171 of the Magna Carta.
The present investigation called legal pluralism and the Constitutional State of Rights of the Republic of Ecuador, had as a general objective; determine the effectiveness of legal pluralism in the constitutional State of law and justice of the Republic of Ecuador, through a qualitative approach, through a descriptive level, a normative method and the application of the documentary technique and the interview, having as a result The main thing is that in order to guarantee legal pluralism, human rights, due process, the social unity of the State and the national and international norms that regulate indigenous justice, adequate coordination and cooperation between ordinary and customary justice is required, but also of a special law that allows covering all those guidelines, limits, prohibitions, guarantees, jurisprudence that encompasses the protection of the collective rights of indigenous peoples and nationalities, without failing to ignore the diversity of ancestral and customary norms, which are part of its own right, managing to conclude that legal plurality requires of normative parameters based on an adequate protection of human rights by the indigenous authorities, in order to determine its effectiveness in the Constitutional State of Rights, plurinational, intercultural and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, at a linguistic, legal, economic level , political and social, by reason of article 171 of the Magna Carta.
Description
Keywords
Pluralismo jurídico, Justicias indígenas, Tutela paritaria, Plurinacionalidad, Interculturalidad