Análisis comparativo sobre las sanciones que se imponen a los servidores públicos que cometen delitos de corrupción (cohecho) en la legislación de Ecuador y Perú
Loading...
Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUCE - Ibarra
Abstract
La corrupción corrompe a la sociedad y detiene su desarrollo, por ello se busca, continuamente, implementar mecanismos para combatirla, por ello, esta investigación tiene como principal objetivo comparar las sanciones que se imponen por el cometimiento del delito de cohecho en Ecuador y en Perú para, de esta manera, aportar en la lucha anticorrupción; para ello se partió, principalmente, de investigaciones anteriores, cuyas posturas contribuyeron significativamente en esta obra. Los métodos empleados son el normativista y el jurídico comparado, debido a que se emplearon, como principales herramientas, la Constitución de la República Ecuador, el Código Orgánico Integral Penal ecuatoriano y las leyes 30424, 635 y 28355 reformatorias del Código Penal del Perú; la comparación entre dichos cuerpos legales que aplican el ius puniendi parte de la interrogante por conocer cuáles son las sanciones que se imponen a los servidores públicos que cometen el delito de cohecho en ambos países. Además, se entrevistó a fiscales de la ciudad de Ibarra especializados en delitos contra la fe pública, administración pública y delincuencia organizada, transnacional e internacional y patrimonio ciudadano y a un servidor público del Perú, constatando, como consecuencia que, en Ecuador, no son muchos los delitos de cohecho sancionados siendo lo común, en nuestra sociedad, que pasen desapercibido o se confundan con cualquier otro delito que se comete contra la administración pública.
Corruption corrupts society and stop its development, therefore it seeks, continuously, implement mechanisms for combating it, although, in Ecuador, this does not occur although there is obvious scandals publicly; Therefore, this research has as main objective need and compare the penalties imposed by the Commission of the crime of bribery in Ecuador and Perú to, in this way, contribute in the fight against corruption; so he split, mainly, of previous research, whose positions contributed significantly in this work. The methods used are the normativista and comparative legal, since they were used, as main tools, the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, the organic comprehensive Ecuadorian criminal code and laws 30424, 635 and reformatorias of the criminal code 28355 of Perú; the comparison between these legal bodies which apply the jus puniendi part of the question to know what are the sanctions that it imposed on public servants who commit the crime of bribery in both countries. In addition, met the city of Ibarra prosecutors specialized in crimes against public faith, public administration and organized crime, transnational e international and heritage citizen and a civil servant of the Perú, noting, as a consequence, in Ecuador, are not many bribery offences sanctioned to being ordinary, in our society, which pass unnoticed or be confused with any another crime committed against the public administration.
Corruption corrupts society and stop its development, therefore it seeks, continuously, implement mechanisms for combating it, although, in Ecuador, this does not occur although there is obvious scandals publicly; Therefore, this research has as main objective need and compare the penalties imposed by the Commission of the crime of bribery in Ecuador and Perú to, in this way, contribute in the fight against corruption; so he split, mainly, of previous research, whose positions contributed significantly in this work. The methods used are the normativista and comparative legal, since they were used, as main tools, the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, the organic comprehensive Ecuadorian criminal code and laws 30424, 635 and reformatorias of the criminal code 28355 of Perú; the comparison between these legal bodies which apply the jus puniendi part of the question to know what are the sanctions that it imposed on public servants who commit the crime of bribery in both countries. In addition, met the city of Ibarra prosecutors specialized in crimes against public faith, public administration and organized crime, transnational e international and heritage citizen and a civil servant of the Perú, noting, as a consequence, in Ecuador, are not many bribery offences sanctioned to being ordinary, in our society, which pass unnoticed or be confused with any another crime committed against the public administration.
Description
Keywords
Cohecho, Sanciones